# FILE NAME: 00000885.soc
# TITLE: Does the UK really need a Royal family? [d9492ab26fa6183b59f0508d66f89550]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 3
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - The UK does need a royal family. The royal family brings in vast amounts of money through tourism boosting the economy. They bring in more money than they cost to the british tax payer. Monarchs serve as figure heads and can bring communities and countries together. They are also apolitical meaning they can be much more suitable to represent the country at state occasions such as remembrance occasions or celebrating social causes. The royal family brings a sense of patriotism and can be seen as a  source of continuity which politicians can not. However, the royal family enjoys too much privilege and too much coverage by the media, that it's an archaic practice that represents a divide between the wealthy and the non wealthy classes of our country. The royal family is also very expensive and is a waste of money that could be spent on other things. The royal family is also very old fashioned and not very relatable to the general public.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - The UK does not need a royal family. The royal family brings in vast amounts of money through tourism boosting the economy. They bring in more money than they cost to the british tax payer. Monarchs serve as figure heads and can bring communities and countries together. They are also apolitical meaning they can be much more suitable to represent the country at state occasions such as remembrance occasions or celebrating social causes. The royal family brings a sense of patriotism and can be seen as a  source of continuity which politicians can not. However, the royal family enjoys too much privilege and too much coverage by the media, that it's an archaic practice that represents a divide between the wealthy and the non wealthy classes of our country. The royal family is also very expensive and is a waste of money that could be spent on other things. The royal family is also very old fashioned and not very relatable to the general public.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - The UK does not need a royal family. The royal family brings in vast amounts of money through tourism boosting the economy. They bring in more money than they cost to the british tax payer. Monarchs serve as figure heads and can bring communities and countries together. They are also apolitical meaning they can be much more suitable to represent the country at state occasions such as remembrance occasions or celebrating social causes. The royal family brings a sense of patriotism and can be seen as a  source of continuity which politicians can not. The royal family enjoys too much privilege and too much coverage by the media, that it's an archaic practice that represents a divide between the wealthy and the non wealthy classes of our country. The royal family is also very expensive and is a waste of money that could be spent on other things. The royal family is also very old fashioned and not very relatable to the general public. However, abolishing the Royal family would have dire consequences for our country. Abolishing the royal family and tourism will plummet and lead to greater poverty, bringing our economy into a sharp downward turn. Even if we replaced the royals with a less traditional or modern representative, tourists may not enjoy a
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - Although the royal family brings in vast amounts of money through tourism boosting the economy. They bring in more money than they cost to the british tax payer. Monarchs serve as figure heads and can bring communities and countries together. They are also apolitical meaning they can be much more suitable to represent the country at state occasions such as remembrance occasions or celebrating social causes. The royal family brings a sense of patriotism and can be seen as a  source of continuity which politicians can not. The royal family enjoys too much privilege and too much coverage by the media, that it's an archaic practice that represents a divide between the wealthy and the non wealthy classes of our country. The royal family is also very expensive and is a waste of money that could be spent on other things. The royal family is also very old fashioned and not very relatable to the general public. The royal family costs money that could be used to build a stronger NHS, take care of care homes for old people and spend money more directly into our community instead of the expensive costumes and titles. We also need to allow more public scrutiny of royal finances and should establish transparency from the crown on all of its property and use. It could also be
3: 4,3,1,2
1: 2,1,3,4
1: 1,4,2,3